Refuting the Claims in Adam Kolasinski’s The Secular Case Against Gay M

Refuting the Claims in Adam Kolasinskis The profane Case Against Gay MarriageGay labor union has been one of the intimately controversial topics of the twenty first century and the topic has mainly circulated rough such issues as fosterage and marriage benefits. Although Adam Kolasinski, the author of The unsanctified Case Against Gay Marriage, never refers to homosexual behavior as wrong, he argues several key points, including financial issues, to conclude why homosexual marriage is not eachowed in the bulk of states. The author, with a degree in financial economics, will first of all already reserve a bleached attitude towards any subject that promotes a better fiscal policy. instant of all, financial economics represents only one factor in the consult of funny marriage. This minute detail diminishes the authors argument significantly since he is probably not extensively knowledgeable in the subject, til now if some of his positions are legitimate. Kolasinskis asser tions and assumptions contain falsehoods and flaws, specifically concerning the overemphasis on procreation and the notion of sexual love.Kolasinski begins his debate with the notion that marriage is not a universal function. He states that a majority of states ban many peck from marrying one another including first cousins, blood relatives, and people with venereal diseases. Although these statements keep back true, the United States did not allow other traditional or chemical formula marriages. For example, in the 1960s, the government would not allow interracial marriages. This exemplifies how the government and the majority can sometimes be tyrannical or compensate wrong. Obviously, 2 heterosexuals of different races can marry without any government opposition. Although marriage... ... the government and a majority of states ban homosexual marriage. Although many of these claims tend to be opinions and even falsehoods, the author contributes a strong argument. Many acco st cases have been issued overdue to the huge controversy of homosexual marriage. In Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the court concluded that the Constitution places limits on a States right to interfere with a persons most basic decisions around family and parenthood(Moss 106). This contradicts with all the rules and regulations that the states place upon marriage and more specifically gay marriage. There have been several cases on the violations of homosexual rights, but laws have not currently been changed so that they have equality in all aspects. In the future, society will hopefully mirror the solution to the 1960s prohibited interracial marriage and permit homosexual marriage.