Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals and the Media - Lesbians on TV :: Media Argumentative Persuasive Argument

Lesbians on TV Illusion of Progress When video recording prime(prenominal) appeared back in the 1940s, time were very different. What we would consider completely design today would have beted quite taboo just a a couple of(prenominal) decades ago. For example, in 1953, Lucille B all(prenominal) was not allowed to say the word pregnant spot she was expecting baby Ricky and it wasnt until the 1960s show Bewitched, that we saw a married couple actually sharing the same bed. Considering how conservative the television networks were back then, it is not great(p) to deduce that something as controversial as homo versedity would be off the beaten track(predicate) from discussed or portrayed at any level. It was only in 1973 that television premiered its low homosexual character. Over the next three decades the emergence of man and lesbian characters in television has increased and decreased as the times have changed. Due to the resurgence of conservatism that came back in the aboriginal 1980s, homosexual topics were again reduced to a minimum. Since that time though, as numerous people can see, there has been a rise of rattling and lesbian characters on television. One might think after a first glance at the previous sentence that there has been progress among gay and lesbian communities to have a fair representation in the media. However, if one(a) looks hard at the circumstances surrounding their portrayal, many people may start to believe that if there has been any progress then it has been quite minimal. In the 1990s there has been what is called a normalized movement(Warner 41). This so-called movement has permeated into all aspects of the Gay and Lesbian movements agenda. It has become increasingly clear in the realms of the media such as television, movies and magazines. The major objective for the proponents of this movement is to make the homosexual seem normal. This would be done by not focusing on the sexual nat ure of the homosexual. Since their sexual behavior is considered deviant by society, any outward-bound expression of it will be looked down upon. So, it has been the goal of some leaders of the movement as well as those who control the media outlets to separate the individualism and sexuality of the homosexual as far as possible.